The Impact of Censorship on Modern Indian Theatre: A Study Before and After Independence Krishan

Abstract

Abstract

The Dramatic Performances Act (DPA), introduced in 1876 during British colonial rule, marked a significant turning point in the regulation of theatre, aiming to curb anti-government sentiment. This legislation reflected the colonial administration's political anxieties by imposing stringent censorship on theatrical productions, fundamentally altering performance practices in India. This paper takes a comparative historical approach to analyze censorship in Indian theatre across two pivotal periods: Colonial India and Post-Independence India. It explores the DPA and associated colonial laws alongside the post-independence censorship mechanisms, including state legislation, review boards, and criminal codes. Through a selection of ten case studies, five from each era, this study highlights significant legal and cultural aspects, public controversies, and the treatment of these plays in academic discourse. Each play is examined in light of the specific grounds for censorship, whether political, moral, or religious, the state's rationale compared to public reception, and the artistic strategies employed to navigate these restrictions. The findings emphasize the intricate relationship between law and performance, placing these examples within broader theoretical frameworks of power and public dialogue, particularly those articulated by Foucault and Habermas. The research indicates that while independence brought constitutional guarantees of free expression, many colonial suppression methods still affect today’s theatre landscape in India. Theatre remains vulnerable to interference, especially regarding socially or politically sensitive topics. The paper argues that the legacy of the DPA continues to shape theatrical practice, showing that censorship has evolved rather than faded, still significantly influencing cultural expression.

References

1. Abbas v. Union of India, AIR 1971 SC 481.
2. Allahabad High Court. (1956). State v. Baboo Lal and Ors. Retrieved from Indiankanoon. https://indiankanoon.org/
3. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge.
4. Bhatia, N. (2004). Acts of authority/acts of resistance: Theatre and politics in colonial and postcolonial India. University of Michigan Press.
5. Bhatia, N. (2010). Censorship, Social Reform, and Mythological Drama in Colonial India (pp. 191–211). In Theatre and censorship in India. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230105522_10
6. Chatterjee, P. (1993). The nation and its fragments: Colonial and postcolonial histories. Princeton University Press.
7. Choudhury, S. (2024). Performing dissent: Colonial censorship and the politics of theatre in India. South Asian Review, 45(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.2024.2327894
8. Dramatic Performances Act, No. XIX of 1876. (1876). Government of India, Legislative Department.
9. Dharwadker, A. (2005). Theatres of independence: Drama, theory, and urban performance in India since 1947. University of Iowa Press.
10. Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Pantheon.
11. Government of India. (2018). Repealing and Amending (Second) Act, 2017. Gazette notification, Ministry of Law and Justice.
12. Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society (T. Burger & F. Lawrence, Trans.). MIT Press.
13. Lal, C. (2022, August). Literature defying the Raj. Yojana, Special Issue: Literature and Freedom, 13–14.
14. Literary Herald. (2020). Kallol by Utpal Dutt (PDF). TLH Journal
15. Menon, A. Sreedhara. (1994). A survey of Kerala history. DC Books.
16. Mukherjee, T. (1982). Colonial legislation and theatre in India. Calcutta Historical Review, 5(2), 45–68.
17. Mukherjee, S. K. (1982). The story of the Calcutta theatres: 1753–1980. K.P. Bagchi and a. Company.
18. Nag, A. (2022, August). Cinema as Vanguard of Nationalist Movement. Yojana, Special Issue: Literature and Freedom, 21–22.
19. Nair, R. (2011). Cultural politics of people’s theatre in Kerala. Oxford University Press.
20. Open Magazine. (2018, November 28). Sakharam Binder and the free speech debate. Open Magazine.
21. Otis, A. (2018). Hicky’s Bengal Gazette: The untold story of India’s first newspaper. Westland.
22. Pluwak, A. (2021). Beyond Outrage: Approaching Arts Controversy in Postcommunist Poland. East European Politics and Societies, 35(3), 682–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888325420928417
23. Punjab Dramatic Performances Act, No. 19 of 1963 (Punjab). https://www.lawsisto.com/
24. Punjab Dramatic Performances Rules, 1965 (Punjab). https://www.lawsisto.com/
25. Pejjai, N., & Tumu, S. P. (2024). The impact of censorship laws on artistic freedom: A study of the ‘Chinthamani’ play in Telugu theatre. Theatre International, XX, 132–162.
26. Rediff. (1998, July 17). Congress disrupts Godse play in Bombay. Rediff.
27. Scroll. (2016, Sept 22). Read: Amol Palekar’s essay on censorship makes a blistering case for the freedom of expression. Scroll.
28. Sahapedia. (n.d.). Censorship and Sakharam Binder (PDF). Sahapedia.
29. Sova, D. B. (n.d.). Banned Plays: Censorship Histories of 125 Stage Dramas. Greenwood Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.42-0021
30. Solomon, R. H. (1994). Culture, imperialism, and nationalist resistance: Performance in colonial India. Theatre Journal, 46(3), 323–347. https://doi.org/10.2307/3208880
31. Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the subaltern speak? In C. Nelson & L. Grossberg (Eds.), Marxism and the interpretation of culture (pp. 271–313). University of Illinois Press.
32. State of Bombay v. F. N. Balsara, AIR 1951 SC 318 (India).
33. The Telegraph. (2019, August 19). Utpal Dutt remembered for Kallol. The Telegraph. https://www.telegraphindia.com/entertainment/remembering-utpal-dutt-on-his-26th-death-anniversary/cid/1698859?utm_source=chatgpt.com
34. The Times of India. (2001, October 10). Court order lifts ban on Godse play. The Times of India.
35. The Wire. (2017, January 19). How dissent played out in the theatre under colonial rule. The Wire.
36. The Wire. (2025, March 5). Modi is wrong: The DPA was unconstitutional since 1956. The Wire.
37. The Wire. (2025, May 18). How the Allahabad High Court weakened the DPA. The Wire.
38. Vajiram & Ravi. (2025, March 3). Colonial-era Dramatic Performances Act. Vajiram & Ravi.
39. Indian Culture. (n.d.). Nationalist plays: Upendra Nath Das. https://indianculture.gov.in/digital-district-repository/district-repository/nationalist-plays-upendra-nath-das
40. Indian Culture. (n.d.). Theatre and colonial censorship in India. https://indianculture.gov.in/node/2820431